On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Employment Law Institute 2018

Released on: Oct. 25, 2018
Running Time: 12:36:25
This two-day event offers a comprehensive review of case law and regulatory developments, an in-depth analysis of emerging issues, and best practices, designed to maximize employment law compliance, mitigate legal risk and achieve business objectives. The faculty is comprised of nationally recognized management and plaintiffs’ attorneys, members of the judiciary, in-house counsel and government enforcement agency officials who share their perspectives, insights and experiences.

Lecture Topics [Total time 12:36:25]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:03:44]
    Amy L. Bess, Zachary D. Fasman
  • Employment Law Lessons Learned from Recent Scandals [01:36:33]
    Amy L. Bess, Lahaja Furaha, Keisha-Ann G. Gray, Laura S. Schnell
  • Benefits and Risks of Social Media in the Workplace [01:00:28]
    Robert D. Kraus, Teri Wilford Wood, Charles W. Fournier
  • Equal Pay/Pay Equity Issues in 2018 [01:01:55]
    Cara E. Greene, Jill L. Rosenberg, Corie Pauling
  • Labor Law Update [01:04:10]
    Zachary D. Fasman, Willis J. Goldsmith, Philip A. Miscimarra, Hanan B. Kolko
  • Discovery Disputes in Employment Law Cases [01:16:07]
    Tracy Richelle High, Raechel L. Adams, Hon. Barbara Moses, Hon. Katharine H. Parker, Hon. James C. Francis IV (Ret.)
  • Gender and Transgender Issues in the Workplace [01:01:23]
    Jessica Golden Cortes, James D. Esseks, Melissa R. Gold
  • Latest Challenges in the Wage & Hour Arena [00:59:48]
    Michele R. Fisher, Joseph K. Mulherin
  • Sophisticated Issues Faced When Litigating Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims [01:01:18]
    Jason C. Schwartz, Matthew S. Stiff
  • Leaves of Absence and Workplace Accommodation: Your Questions Answered [01:30:41]
    Sara E. Elder, Robert M. Hale, Christopher J. Kuczynski, Debra L. Raskin
  • Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace [00:59:32]
    Jamie Kohen, Patricia B. Miller, Robert S. Whitman
  • Confidentiality Issues: Non-clients’ Misconduct [01:00:42]
    Thomas E. Spahn

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Employment Law Lessons Learned from Recent Scandals (July 30, 2018)
    Lahaja Furaha, Keisha-Ann G. Gray, Amy L. Bess, Laura S. Schnell
  • Benefits and Risks of Social Media in the Workplace
    Teri Wilford Wood, Robert D. Kraus, Michael A. Curley
  • Comparing the Equal Pay Protections of Title VII to the Equal Pay Act and New York’s Achieve Equal Pay Act
    Cara E. Greene
  • Developments in Pay Equity/Equal Pay Law (July 23, 2018)
    Jill L. Rosenberg, Corie Pauling
  • Zachary D. Fasman, et al., Labor Law Update
    Zachary D. Fasman, Willis J. Goldsmith, Philip A. Miscimarra, Hanan B. Kolko
  • Tracy Richelle High and Christina Andersen, Discovery Disputes in Employment Law Cases
    Tracy Richelle High
  • Gender and Transgender Issues in the Workplace (July 23, 2018)
    Jessica Golden Cortes
  • Ria Tabacco Mar, Gender Identity Discrimination and Sexual Orientation Discrimination as Sex Discrimination in Federal Law (July 5, 2018)
    James D. Esseks
  • The Impact of Epic Systems on Wage and Hour Litigation, and Appellate Wage & Hour Case Law Update(June 2018)
    Michele R. Fisher
  • Debra S. Katz and Matthew LaGarde, Sophisticated Issues Faced When Litigating Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims (July 6, 2018)
    Debra S. Katz
  • Eugene Scalia, Laura Mumm and Molly Senger, Lawyers as Whistleblowers: Some Legal and Practical Considerations (March 30, 2018)
    Eugene Scalia
  • Leave Under the Americans with Disabilities Act: A Summary of Recent Cases and Trends, a Post-Severson Analysis, and Compliance Takeaways
    Sara E. Elder
  • The Family and Medical Leave Act (July 23, 2018)
    Robert M. Hale
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Employer-Provided Leave and the Americans with Disabilities Act
    Christopher J. Kuczynski
  • Interplay Among Leave Laws
    Debra L. Raskin
  • Myles V. Lynk, Chair, American Bar Association, Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice, Commission on Disability Rights, Diversity & Inclusion 360 Commission, Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession, Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Commission on Women in the Profession, Report to the House of Delegates, Revised Resolution 109 (August 2016)
    Jamie Kohen, Patricia B. Miller, Robert S. Whitman
  • Part 1200, Rule 8.4, Rules of Professional Conduct, New York State Unified Court System (January 1, 2017)
    Jamie Kohen, Patricia B. Miller, Robert S. Whitman
  • Judge Ann Donnelly, Individual Practices and Rules (September 27, 2017)
    Jamie Kohen, Patricia B. Miller, Robert S. Whitman
  • Individual Motion Practice of Judge Jack B. Weinstein
    Patricia B. Miller, Jamie Kohen, Robert S. Whitman
  • Best Practices for Creating an Environment Free of Sexual Harassment
    Jamie Kohen, Patricia B. Miller, Robert S. Whitman
  • Hypotheticals
    Thomas E. Spahn
  • Hypotheticals and Analysis, Misprision of Felonies
    Thomas E. Spahn

Presentation Material

  • Employment Law Lessons Learned From Recent Scandals
    Amy L. Bess, Lahaja Furaha, Keisha-Ann G. Gray, Laura S. Schnell
  • Benefits and Risks of Social Media in the Workplace
    Charles W. Fournier, Robert D. Kraus, Teri Wilford Wood
  • Equal Pay/Pay Equity Issues in 2018
    Cara E. Greene, Corie Pauling, Jill L. Rosenberg
  • Labor Law Update
    Zachary D. Fasman, Willis J. Goldsmith, Hanan B. Kolko, Philip A. Miscimarra
  • Discovery Disputes in Employment Law Cases
    Raechel L. Adams, Hon. James C. Francis IV (Ret.), Tracy Richelle High, Hon. Barbara Moses, Hon. Katharine H. Parker
  • Gender and Transgender Issues in the Workplace
    Jessica Golden Cortes, James D. Esseks, Melissa R. Gold
  • Latest Challenges in the Wage & Hour Arena
    Michele R. Fisher, Joseph K. Mulherin
  • Sophisticated Issues Faced When Litigating Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims
    Jason C. Schwartz, Matthew S. Stiff
  • Sophisticated Issues Faced When Litigating Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims Handout
    Jason C. Schwartz, Matthew S. Stiff
  • Leaves of Absence and Workplace Accommodation: Your Questions Answered
    Sara E. Elder, Robert M. Hale, Christopher J. Kuczynski, Debra L. Raskin
  • Confidentiality Issues: Non-clients’ Misconduct
    Thomas E. Spahn
Co-Chair(s)
Amy L. Bess ~ Vedder Price P.C.
Zachary D. Fasman ~ Proskauer Rose LLP
Speaker(s)
Raechel L. Adams ~ Supervisory Trial Attorney, New York District Office, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jessica Golden Cortes ~ Davis & Gilbert LLP
Sara E. Elder ~ Divisional Vice President, Associate Relations and Compliance, Sears Holdings Management Corporation
James D. Esseks ~ Director, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & HIV Project, ACLU Foundation
Michele R. Fisher ~ Nichols Kaster, PLLP
Charles W. Fournier ~ Curley, Hurtgen & Johnsrud LLP
Hon. James C. Francis IV (Ret.) ~ Distinguished Lecturer, CUNY School of Law
Lahaja Furaha ~ Organizational Culture Practice Lead & Sr. Human Capital Advisor, People and Performance Consulting, Management Concepts
Melissa R. Gold ~ Associate General Counsel and Managing Director, BNY Mellon
Willis J. Goldsmith ~ Jones Day
Keisha-Ann G. Gray ~ Proskauer Rose LLP
Cara E. Greene ~ Outten & Golden LLP
Robert M. Hale ~ Goodwin Procter LLP
Tracy Richelle High ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Jamie Kohen ~ Executive Director and Assistant General Counsel, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Hanan B. Kolko ~ Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
Robert D. Kraus ~ Kraus & Zuchlewski LLP
Christopher J. Kuczynski ~ Assistant Legal Counsel, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Patricia B. Miller ~ Chief of the Special Federal Litigation Division, Office of the Corporation Counsel, New York City Law Department
Philip A. Miscimarra ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Hon. Barbara Moses ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Joseph K. Mulherin ~ Vedder Price P.C.
Hon. Katharine H. Parker ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Corie Pauling ~ Senior Vice President, Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer, TIAA
Debra L. Raskin ~ Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, P.C.
Jill L. Rosenberg ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Laura S. Schnell ~ Eisenberg & Schnell LLP
Jason C. Schwartz ~ Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Thomas E. Spahn ~ McGuire Woods LLP
Matthew S. Stiff ~ Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP
Robert S. Whitman ~ Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Teri Wilford Wood ~ Associate General Counsel, IBM Corporation
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Employment Law Institute 2019 (New York, NY) Oct. 15 - 16, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Employment Law Institute 2019  
Employment Law Institute 2018 Zachary D. Fasman, Proskauer Rose LLP
Amy L. Bess, Vedder Price P.C.
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.